House may not be responsible for Volger's actions, but as Wilson put it: The only person to defend House was Wilson who was then fired. House stands on his principles and refuses to humble himself to Volger and therefore causes Volger to threaten his job with a vote in a board meeting. The first example I could think of for this was at the end of the Volger arc in season 1 the episode called "Babies and Bathwater". At first my reaction was God NO, House couldn't help that they got into a bus accident but then I noticed something lebih that the writer's were trying to say.Ī main theme through House is the way he treats people and how his actions may not directly cause the misery and he 'techinically" is not to blame for a deed done, but indirectly he has caused people pain.
Is House to blame for the actions of others?Īfter watching Wilson's hati, tengah-tengah I noticed that the writer's left us with a deep thought about the soalan of whether House is guilty as to the death of Amber.
0 kommentar(er)
